How azurementor/azure-az-900-study-guide works
<explanation>
1. Identify the project type and purpose
- This repository is not an application or service in the traditional sense but a set of Markdown‑based study materials for the Microsoft AZ‑900 Azure Fundamentals exam.
- It consists of three topic files covering cloud concepts, Azure architecture & services, and Azure management & governance, plus a README that ties them together.
2. Analyze the file structure
- Top‑level files:
• 1-Describe cloud concepts (25–30%).md
• 2-Describe Azure architecture and services (35–40%).md
• 3-Describe Azure management and governance (30–35%).md
• README.md
- No code, no “src” or “tests” directories—this is purely content.
- No build scripts appear here, but in a typical publishing workflow these files would be fed into a Static Site Generator (SSG) or documentation framework.
3. Examine the README for additional insights
- It lists the three skill categories and links to Microsoft Learn paths and a free practice assessment.
- It’s clearly intended to be used as an adjunct to official Microsoft Learn resources.
4. Main components for the diagram
a. Content Layer
– Markdown files (3 topic files + README)
b. Build/Publish Pipeline
– Example: MkDocs, Hugo, Jekyll or another SSG
– Continuous Integration (GitHub Actions, Azure DevOps)
c. Hosting/Delivery
– GitHub Pages or Azure Static Web Apps (with optional CDN)
d. End Users
– Candidates studying for AZ‑900, accessing via web browser
e. External Services
– Microsoft Learn links and Practice Assessment URLs
5. Relationships and interactions
- Markdown files → (piped into) Static Site Generator → Builds HTML/CSS/JS
- CI Pipeline triggers on push → Deploys static assets to hosting environment
- End user accesses the hosted site → Follows links to external Microsoft Learn resources and practice assessment
- Optional: CDN caches assets for global performance
6. Architectural patterns and design principles
- Static Site Generation: decouples content from presentation, ensures fast performance and low cost
- Git‑based workflow: content changes trigger automated builds and deployments
- Single‑Page or Multi‑Page approach: depending on chosen SSG, could be served as an SPA or classic MPA
- Idempotent, repeatable builds for consistency between environments
7. Technologies and frameworks (examples)
- Content: Markdown
- SSG: MkDocs (with Material theme) / Hugo / Jekyll
- CI/CD: GitHub Actions or Azure Pipelines
- Hosting: GitHub Pages or Azure Static Web Apps
- CDN: Azure CDN or GitHub’s built‑in CDN
8. Guidelines for tailoring the diagram
a. Clearly separate “Content” vs “Build Pipeline” vs “Hosting” vs “User” vs “External Resources.”
b. Use directional arrows to show:
– Content checked into repo → triggers CI/CD
– CI/CD → invokes SSG → produces static site → deploys to Hosting
– User → HTTP request → Hosting/CDN → serves content
– In‑page links → navigate to Microsoft Learn or Practice Assessment
c. Color‑code or shape‑code the elements:
– Documents (Markdown) in one color/shape
– Build/CI systems in another
– Hosting infra in a third
– Users/external services in a fourth
9. Diagram elements to include
- Labels:
• Repo Content (Markdown files)
• CI/CD Pipeline (e.g., GitHub Actions)
• Static Site Generator
• Hosting (Azure Static Web Apps / GitHub Pages + CDN)
• End User (Browser)
• External Microsoft Learn Links
- Arrows to show:
• Commit → Build → Deploy → Serve
• User navigation to external URLs
- Visual cues (colors or shapes) distinguishing content artifacts, processes, infrastructure, and external services
10. Detailed but not over‑engineered
- Capture each logical layer without trying to force microservices or complex databases.
- Focus on how simple Markdown files evolve into a published study guide website and how users interact with both the local content and linked external resources.
</explanation>